Part 91

Part 91 Aircraft Financing

Under Part 91 the aircraft is a tool of the business that owns it, not a revenue asset in its own right. That is the central fact of the structure: the payment is carried by the company the aircraft serves, so the analysis follows that company rather than a flight schedule.

Who this is for

The operations this fits.

Corporate flight departments and company aircraft

Owner-operators flying their own aircraft

Family offices and private principals

Businesses replacing charter spend with an owned aircraft

Owners moving an aircraft between ownership entities

Structures

How the program is structured.

Acquisition Loan

The most common Part 91 structure. The company keeps title and the depreciation position, and the term is set against how long the aircraft will serve the business.

Operating Lease

Where the accounting treatment or a defined hold period matters more than ownership, a lease sets a residual and leaves a genuine choice at term end.

Sale Leaseback

For a company that already owns its aircraft and would rather have the capital working elsewhere, without giving up the aircraft or how it is operated.

Not sure which fits?

Bring us the aircraft and the mission — we’ll model the alternatives side by side.

Book a Consultation
Underwriting

What the desk reads.

The operating business and its financial position

How the aircraft supports that business

The ownership entity and how it is capitalized

Flight department structure, or the management arrangement

Expected annual hours and typical mission

Maintenance program and where the aircraft is based

Common questions

Asked before the term sheet.

How is a Part 91 deal different from a charter operator's?

The source of the payment. A Part 91 aircraft produces no revenue of its own — it saves time for a business, and the business carries the obligation. So the analysis is a corporate credit conversation with an aircraft attached, rather than an assessment of what the aircraft will earn.

Does putting the aircraft in a separate entity complicate financing?

Not usually, and it is the norm. What matters is that the entity's relationship to the operating business is clear and properly documented, since the entity holding title often has no independent means of making payments. That is a structuring question worth settling with counsel early.

What if the aircraft occasionally carries charter?

Then the arrangement needs describing accurately, because an aircraft placed on someone else's certificate part of the time is operating under two sets of rules. It is entirely financeable, but the structure, the insurance, and the maintenance expectations all depend on which hours are flown under which regime.

Speak with the aviation desk

Tell us about the aircraft. We’ll engineer the rest.

Confidential response within one business day.

Book a Consultation