Insights
The Perils of “My Client Has Financing Handled”
“My client has financing handled” is a comfortable premise, not a fact — and the data says it's the most expensive assumption in the transaction.
By Kyle O'Donnell · 2026-08-21

Every aircraft sales professional has heard the sentence, usually within the first fifteen minutes of the engagement, always delivered with total confidence: “Financing's handled, my bank's got it.” And every professional who's been at this longer than one market cycle knows what that sentence looks like on day 45: an underwriting file stalled in a committee that meets biweekly, a third request for entity documents nobody mentioned needing on day one, a listing broker starting to ask politely, then less politely, whether this buyer can actually perform. Meanwhile the pre-buy slot you fought to get at the service center is burning, the contingency window in the LOI is closing, and the backup offer that was theoretical in week two is suddenly returning the listing broker's calls.
The data says this isn't anecdote. Secured Research analysis of business aviation transactions found financing to be the leading cause of missed closing dates, implicated in 44% of delayed transactions — more than pre-purchase inspection findings and title issues combined. And in the majority of those files, the buyer entered the deal genuinely believing financing was already arranged.
44%
of delayed business aviation transactions trace back to financing
#1
cause of missed closing dates — ahead of pre-buy findings and title issues combined
2×
on-schedule close rate when committed specialist financing is in place at LOI
Secured Research · Business aviation transaction analysis
“Handled” means a conversation happened. It almost never means a structure exists.
Why the Relationship Bank Fails on Aviation Timelines
The buyer's commercial bank is a natural first call and, for most of the buyer's financial life, the right one. But aviation is a specialty asset, and the relationship bank approaches it the way generalist institutions approach anything unfamiliar: slowly, conservatively, and with documentation requests that escalate as the committee's discomfort grows. Secured Research found the median bank underwriting timeline on business aircraft ran 47 to 62 days from application to committed terms. This against LOI financing contingency windows that typically run 21 to 30 days. The median bank process doesn't fit inside the median deal. That's a scheduling contradiction built into the deal from the day the LOI is signed.
The median bank process vs. the median deal
The contingency window closes roughly three weeks before the median bank delivers terms — assuming the bank ultimately says yes.
And that median assumes the bank ultimately says yes. Layer in the realities of the pre-owned market: the airframe is older than the age policy allows, the aircraft flies supplemental 135, and the file doesn't simply slow down, it dies, typically in week five or six, after the deposit has gone hard. Every experienced broker has a version of this story. Most have several. The aircraft was fine. The buyer was fine. The lender was wrong for the deal, and nobody checked until the deposit was already exposed.
The Anatomy of the Timeline
Aviation transactions run on sequenced deadlines that assume financing is the settled variable. The LOI sets the contingency clock. The pre-purchase inspection slot anchors the closing date. Escrow instructions, insurance binding, registry filings, and international registry consents all flow off that schedule. There is no slack in the sequence for a lender discovering aviation in real time. When the bank's process stretches from four weeks to nine, the deal doesn't gracefully extend. It hands leverage back to the seller, and, in any market with reasonable inventory velocity, which is most of them right now, invites the backup buyer in. Secured Research found that transactions blowing their original financing contingency window closed at materially lower rates, and among light and midsize jets with healthy demand, a meaningful share of those aircraft went to a backup offer. The fourth quarter compounds all of it: with 100% bonus depreciation restored, year-end placed-in-service deadlines stack dozens of closings into the same December weeks, and the buyer whose financing wobbles in November doesn't get a January do-over on the tax year.
Who Actually Pays for the Collapse
Here is the part the client never sees. When a financing failure kills a transaction, the buyer loses a deal. The broker loses considerably more. The commission evaporates after months of sourcing, showing, and negotiating. The listing side remembers exactly whose buyer failed to perform, and listing brokers talk to each other, constantly. And the client, the one who insisted on day one that financing was handled, very often walks away associating the collapse with the broker who managed the transaction rather than the bank that sat on it. Secured Research found brokers rated financing failures as more damaging to repeat business and referral flow than any other cause of a collapsed deal — worse than inspection blowups, worse than trades that crater on valuation.
Consider the asymmetry in how the profession manages every other risk in the deal. Brokers vet the inspection facility and fight for the slot. They manage title searches, liens, and international registry discharges through counsel who do nothing else. They paper the escrow with firms in Oklahoma City that have seen every failure mode a closing can produce. Financing — the single most common killer of closings, per the data — is the one load-bearing element routinely left to an unexamined assumption made by the least experienced party in the room: the buyer.
The Second Question
After “what's your budget” — the question that protects the transaction
“Who is structuring your financing, and have they seen this aircraft type?”
Not “do you have a bank?” Everyone has a bank.
Has the lender evaluated this airframe, this vintage, this engine program status, this use profile, this ownership entity — and issued terms against them? If the answer is “we'll figure it out,” the deal is carrying an unpriced contingency, and the broker is the one ultimately underwriting it.
The broker who presses that question on day one, and who introduces a specialist lender when the answer is soft, does three things simultaneously.
1Converts the risk
A hidden deal risk becomes a managed workstream with a date on it.
2Repositions the broker
The advisor who anticipated the failure mode, not the agent who inherited it.
3Compresses the timeline
To something the LOI can actually live with.
A lender with genuine aviation capability — in-house asset expertise, structuring authority, fluency in older airframes and charter arrangements — issues real terms in days and closes on the transaction's schedule instead of a committee's calendar. Secured Research found that transactions entering the LOI with committed specialist financing closed on their original timeline at nearly twice the rate of those relying on relationship-bank arrangements initiated after the LOI was signed.
What the Right Referral Relationship Looks Like
Elevex underwrites the aircraft and the situation, not just the balance sheet.
For the aircraft broker looking for the only things that matter in this industry — deals that close on schedule and clients who come back for the next airframe — you need a financing conversation you control from day one instead of one you discover in week six.
The Bottom Line
“My client has financing handled” is a comfortable premise, not a fact — and the data says it's the most expensive assumption in the transaction. The brokers who build durable businesses are the ones who verify it before the LOI is signed, and who know exactly who to call the moment the answer sounds softer than it did in the first meeting.
Most lenders finance assets. We engineer outcomes.
Stop waiting on financing decisions
Get equipment financing built around outcomes, not assets. Talk to an expert today.